Sandwell Local Plan - Reg 19 Publication

Search representations

Results for Holly Harrison search

New search New search

Comment

Sandwell Local Plan - Reg 19 Publication

Purpose of this Statement

Representation ID: 1290

Received: 25/09/2024

Respondent: Holly Harrison

Representation Summary:

The phrasing ‘local sustainability factors may allow for a reduction in off-street parking requirements’ doesn’t sufficiently allow the local planning authority to approve lower car parking on sites that are accessible to public transport and take into account low car ownership, as per Chapter 12 of the NPPF. The wording should be changed to ‘local sustainability factors SHOULD allow for a reduction in off-street parking requirements’. Otherwise this isn’t in the spirit of the NPPF in promoting more dense and sustainable design (ie less car parking) in appropriate locations such as near train stations/bus stops/town centres.

Full text:

The phrasing ‘local sustainability factors may allow for a reduction in off-street parking requirements’ doesn’t sufficiently allow the local planning authority to approve lower car parking on sites that are accessible to public transport and take into account low car ownership, as per Chapter 12 of the NPPF. The wording should be changed to ‘local sustainability factors SHOULD allow for a reduction in off-street parking requirements’. Otherwise this isn’t in the spirit of the NPPF in promoting more dense and sustainable design (ie less car parking) in appropriate locations such as near train stations/bus stops/town centres.

Object

Sandwell Local Plan - Reg 19 Publication

Residential Parking Standards for Housing

Representation ID: 1291

Received: 25/09/2024

Respondent: Holly Harrison

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Wording should be ‘The Council WILL consider reduced off street parking provision’ to give planning officers strong policy wording to justify lower parking for appropriate sites. Not strong enough wording and therefore is not in the spirit of the NPPF which promotes sustainable development.

Change suggested by respondent:

Wording should be ‘The Council WILL consider reduced off street parking provision’ to give planning officers strong policy wording to justify lower parking for appropriate sites. Not strong enough wording and therefore is not in the spirit of the NPPF which promotes sustainable development.

Full text:

Wording should be ‘The Council WILL consider reduced off street parking provision’ to give planning officers strong policy wording to justify lower parking for appropriate sites. Not strong enough wording and therefore is not in the spirit of the NPPF which promotes sustainable development.

Object

Sandwell Local Plan - Reg 19 Publication

Innovative use of design solutions

Representation ID: 1292

Received: 25/09/2024

Respondent: Holly Harrison

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Minimum parking standards outdated and inappropriate for assessing whether development is sustainable in terms of Transportation

Change suggested by respondent:

Change minimum parking standards to maximum parking standards

Full text:

Minimum parking standards outdated and inappropriate for assessing whether development is sustainable in terms of Transportation

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.