Draft Regulation 18 Sandwell Local Plan

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.

Permeability Across Motorways and Key Route Network:
We recommend a thorough consideration of permeability across the motorway and key route network for pedestrians and cyclists. Ensuring safe and convenient crossing points is crucial for promoting active travel and creating an integrated transport network.

Interactions of Multi-Modal Journeys:
The plan should emphasise the importance of seamless interactions between various modes of transportation. Integration between walking, cycling, and public transport is essential for creating a cohesive and user-friendly transport system.

Inclusion of National Cycle Network:

The draft plan lacks explicit mention of the National Cycle Network. We recommend its inclusion as a key element in the cycling chapter to highlight the importance of regional and national connectivity for cyclists.

Road Space Reallocation and Speed Management:

The plan is unclear on the need for road space reallocation or changes in speeds to prioritise active travel. We suggest that a default consideration of reallocating road space and managing speeds should be incorporated to promote active travel.

Inclusion and Diversity in Accessibility:

While accessibility is briefly mentioned, the plan should elaborate on inclusion and diversity, ensuring that design for active travel accommodates everyone, including those with diverse mobility needs.

Linking Developments to the Network:

The plan should emphasize how new developments will link to the existing network. Consideration should be given to creating secondary networks to fill gaps, ensuring a comprehensive and well-connected active travel infrastructure.

Car Parking Ratios in New Developments:

Given Sandwell's high ratio of car parking in new developments, we recommend exploring policies that support and incentivise active travel, potentially reevaluating parking requirements to encourage walking and cycling.

Car Parking on Kerbs as an Issue:

The plan should address concerns related to car parking on kerbs as it may impact the safety and convenience of pedestrians and cyclists. Policies should be developed to minimise such issues and promote a safer environment for active travel.

Public Transport Accessibility for All:
The plan should emphasise the importance of making public transport accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This involves not only physical accessibility but also ensuring that information and services are inclusive.

Promotion of Active Travel Initiatives:

We would encourage the inclusion of initiatives to actively promote walking and cycling, such as public awareness campaigns, community events, and educational programs to foster a culture of active transportation.

Community Engagement in Planning:
We advocate for meaningful community engagement in the planning process, ensuring that local residents and stakeholders have a say in the development of the transport network to address specific community needs and concerns.


In conclusion, we believe that addressing these points will contribute to the development of a transport network that prioritises sustainability, accessibility, and the well-being of the community. We appreciate your consideration of our comments and look forward to continued collaboration in fostering a transport system that aligns with the principles of active travel.